|
Every Independence day I can't help but to think about the time my family took me to New York City to watch the 4th of July fireworks exploding in the harbor above the Statue of Liberty. What a spectacular scene. Today marks an especially historic day for Lady Liberty, as her glorious crown reopens to tourists after being closed since September 11, 2001. CNN pays tribute to this historic event here. Every time I think of the Statue of Liberty, I think about how the ultimate symbol of America is also the symbol of how our nation has always welcomed immigrants. The famous Emma Lazarus quote that is permanently inscribed at the statue reminds us of this: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door." In the spirit of this quote, I wanted to take this opportunity to share a new release from the Immigration Policy Center. The IPC has compiled a new fact sheet on immigrant contributions to our economy and society, and a collection of resources that tell the compelling story of America's immigrants. From the IPC: Independence Day is a good time to take stock of the demographic diversity that has long been a principal strength of the U.S. economy and civil society. Immigrants, Latinos, and Asians play critical economic roles as workers, entrepreneurs, and consumers. As a result, they will be crucial players in the nation’s efforts to recover from the current recession. Moreover, the immigrant, Latino, and Asian communities are key voting blocs that successful politicians cannot afford to ignore, particularly in close elections. Download the complete PDF fact sheet here. On a final note, I really enjoyed this inspiring video about an immigrant family celebrating their first 4th of July as citizens. Seeing their joy and gratitude reminds me never to take my own citizenship and rights for granted.
Jul01Honduras and Latin America's Enduring WeaknessesPosted By Tina Kosikowski at 09:17 AM | 0 Comments
"Honduras crisis shows Latin America's weaknesses" by Juan Tamayo from the Miami Herald reflects not only on the current political instability of Honduras, but also the implications of overall weak Latin American military forces AND civilian frameworks. The stage for the first coup in Latin America within the last 16 years, Honduras has sparked global conversation regarding the sources of political and infrastructural weakness plaguing Latin American countries. This reflection presented by Tamayo is easily applicable to other power struggles concerning Colombia, Argentina, Nicaragua, and Mexico.
Drug trafficking, border violence, immigration, and other issues with U.S./Mexico ties never stand alone as isolated incidences. There are inevitable sources of imbalance causing sociopolitical conflict evidenced by interpretations of democracy and faulty leadership hierarchies between military and civilian powers. Have you ever muddled over the differences between U.S. democracy and that of Latin America? Then, don't miss out on this insightful, yet clear discussion regarding the current state of Latin American democracy in light of current events! Excerpt from, "Honduras crisis shows Latin America's weaknesses" by Juan Tamayo- The weekend ouster of Honduran President Manuel Zelaya showed just how easily Latin American countries can plunge into crises when their institutions prove too weak to resolve stand-offs between government branches, analysts say. ''The larger set of problems highlighted by the Honduras case is that in some Latin American countries the rule of law is fragile, and the institutional framework for resolution of conflicts is very fragile,'' said Bruce Bagley, a Latin America specialist at the University of Miami. Zelaya's ouster and expulsion to Costa Rica by the military early Sunday capped a long-simmering crisis that pitted the president against virtually every other branch of government over his plan for a nonbinding referendum that could have opened the door to constitutional reforms -- including allowing presidential reelection. The constitution prohibits any change in its ban on reelection [...] ''We are abiding by the Constitution,'' said Roberto Micheletti, elevated from head of the congress to interim president after Zelaya's ouster, arguing the president was removed legitimately -- an argument rejected by Washington and most other countries. ''Both sides committed errors,'' Bagley said. ``But the military conducted a coup. There are procedures for removing a president. Impeach him. That's the way these things should happen.But you should not get the military involved. In fact, no one has been abiding by the rules in the Zelaya dispute,'' added Bagley, ``which in any case is not unusual for Honduras and other Latin American countries where the institutions of government are weak.'' ''Institutional weaknesses are a very serious problem in some parts of Latin America, and are at the root of many of the problems in those countries,'' said José Miguel Vivanco, director of Human Rights Watch-Americas, in a telephone interview. As in Honduras, he noted, the armed forces in some Latin American countries have never been totally subordinated to civilian power. ''Even in the best of cases, the civilian governments are often forced to negotiate with the military,'' he said. POLARIZATION Several Latin American countries also are currently going through a period of ''strong political polarization'' in which both leaders and opponents have adopted ''inflexible positions'' that make it difficult to find compromise without authoritarian dictats or violent street protests, Vivanco added [...] Combine those troubling factors with Latin America's traditional bent toward caudillismo -- strong one-man rule, usually by a charismatic leader -- and it's no surprise some countries in the region find it difficult to resolve conflicts that pit one part of the government against another, Vivanco added. PUSH FOR CHANGE The human rights activists also argued -- as have several other U.S. and Latin American academics in recent years -- that the region should abandon its generally strong presidential systems and move toward parliamentary systems where the legislative majority controls the executive branch, and early elections can be held when the ruling party suffers a significant defeat [...] ''The parliamentary system is more sensitive to the oscillations of people amid a crisis,'' he added. ``It's an option that allows you to resolve conflicts, without having to count how many generals you have in your favor, or how many street protests you can organize.'' Photo courtesy of: ESTEBAN FELIX/AP Since New York Senator Charles Schumer replaced ailing Edward Kennedy as the head of the Judiciary immigration subcommittee, he has been vocal about his ideas regarding comprehensive immigration reform.
The Senator also said that legislation could be taken up later this year, but only if a crackdown on illegal immigration is given first priority. While I agree with some of Schumer’s principles, I have concerns about some of the wording, and the fact that they do not indicate just how the 12 million undocumented immigrants currentlyworking in America could obtain legal status. Also important to note is that fact that the statements were made before the official White House meeting on immigration reform occured. After the White House meeting, Obama announced that Janet Napolitano woulld be leading a working group with members of both chambers to outline a bill, talk through the issue, and work out details. This being the case, it will be interesting to see how many of Schumer’s principles are reflected in the final legislation moving forward. Jun27General Optimism Moving Forward on ReformPosted By Cristina Noriega at 04:28 PM | 0 Comments
There's been a lot of commentary in the few days since Thursday's pivotal White House meeting to discuss reforming our nation's broken immigration system. Right before the meeting, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel made statements indicating a bleak outlook for the possibility of reform this year. But luckily the post-meeting outlook has been more positive. Following are some of the highlights from the last few days. Today, this editorial appeared in the New York Times. It provides a very optimistic viewpoint, as indicated by the following key excerpts: "It led to a persuasive show of unity among Republicans and Democrats. Both sides made the case for getting a comprehensive reform bill written and passed this year, or early next. Mr. Obama announced that the homeland security secretary, Janet Napolitano, would lead a working group of both parties and houses of Congress to do that." Participants were able to rally around some tough-sounding principles, outlined in a speech by Senator Charles Schumer of New York, who heads the immigration subcommittee: "The borders and workplace need tighter enforcement. Illegal immigrants must be required to register, learn English and pay taxes — or face deportation. But they should also be allowed to seek citizenship. The path back to a lawful system is through legalization and an improved, well-managed immigration flow." America's Voice also provided detailed commentary on the issue, saying that the prospects of achieving immigration reform this year look better than ever. And I particularly enjoyed reading Citizen Orange's analysis, which looks at the human side of the debate: "...migrant advocates are doing an excellent job of creating a sense of urgency and hope around migration reform which we need. Migration reform needs to be tackled sooner rather than later. We cannot wait another year, or two, or three, or four, while people are dying and families are being torn apart." I agree, we can't keep waiting for reform. And the good news is that Congress pretty much agrees on the points outlined by Schumer, and the majority of Americans want to see reform too. What is tougher to reach a consensus on is how to manage the flow of future immigrants.The big fear seems to be that if extra visas are granted to meet the workforce demand, Americans will lose jobs. But history has shown that this really in not the case. Even now, in the midst of a recession and record-high unemployment,there are huge labor shortages in agriculture and other industries. Hopefully, this point won't delay passage of comprehensive legisltation. For more immigration highlights, click here.
I throughly enjoy visuals such as this which transform our perspectives... COMMENT if you have something to say! Courtesy of stopthenorthamericanunion.com Jun25Today's White House Agenda: Immigration ReformPosted By Cristina Noriega at 02:35 PM | 2 Comments
I have to admit, I’ve been waiting for this day for a while now. Because today is when President Obama is meeting with key members of Congress to discuss immigration reform. In light of my enthusiam, reading White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel’s following statement on the Immigration Prof blog made my heart sink a little: Just hours before President Obama hosted lawmakers for a discussion on immigration at the White House, Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel conceded that Obama and his allies on Capitol Hill do not have the votes to pass a comprehensive reform bill. Emanuel could not have been any more direct when he told reporters, "If the votes were there, you wouldn’t need to have the meeting." The only real glimmer of hope he was willing to offer was saying that it would not be impossible to do this year. He also does not consider putting it off until next year the kiss of death, as many pro-migrant activists have implied, and as this LA Times article discusses. Mr. Emanuel’s bluntness is in marked contract to statements made by Senate majority leader Harry Reid just two days ago, when he reiterated that the votes to pass immigration reform this year were there. The White House has referred to today’s gathering as a "working session" that will allow participants to get a feel for what passable legislation will need to look like. But the White House has been extra careful not to make promises on a timeline for passage or offer details on what final legislation will look like. I can’t wait to see what the official meeting report will look like and what plans will be put in place beginning today. Waiting on pins and needles... Jun25Why Media Stalled on Brisenia Flores, Awaits the Next JonBenetPosted By Tina Kosikowski at 02:33 PM | 0 Comments
At first, I thought Tom Hall's "Empathy for the Common Man" was going to be another platform for political discussion simply sourcing the murder of Brisenia and Raul Flores. Thanks to a mid-day cup of coffee, I had enough patience to skim the article until I saw the words, "little white girl," "children of color," "murder by racists," "media coverage," "Arizona," and "Holocaust Museum." How do those words fit together in a single article?! My interest was sparked, so I read on...
The progressive email arrived while I was lamenting the press coverage of the shooting at the Holocaust Museum. The facts of the shooting don’t seem in much doubt. A bigot with a long history of expressing his racism finally tried to go out in a blaze of hateful glory. And, like the plans for glory of so many other hatemongers, including Hitler, his plans failed. Hitler and Pol Pot had to face the judgment of history. This killer, like Timothy McVeigh, will have to face the judgment of a jury of his peers. His actual peers, not those he might wish were his peers. But while the nation fastened its attention on the shooting of a guard in Washington D.C., the Associated Press was trying to circulate a story about another murder by racists. The story was about a Latino father and his young daughter who were gunned down by right-wing, border “militiamen,”carrying badges and pretending to be enforcing U.S. sovereignty. The story got no traction. Ever wonder why non-Anglo children who are kidnapped or heinously murdered never receive equal fanfare as little white girls do? Ever wonder why media coverage of racist murders gravitates toward interesting, sexy, famous places like the Holocaust Museum instead of, for example, private homes of hispanic border families? While Mr. Hall's article covered a wide range of topics, his discussion of race politics and the differences between the Arizona/Holocaust Museum shootings captured my attention- The father was a legal resident. He was employed. He was doing what the right wing says it wants legal immigrants to do. But he and his daughter are now dead, shot in their home by self-proclaimed “patriots”. That’s right, shot in their home, not while working as guards in a public facility. But like the guard, shot because they were “racially inferior” in the eyes of their killers. Are they also racially inferior in the eyes of all those who believe that a killing by a madman in a famous venue is more important than the killing of a Latino family, in their homes, by an organized group of right-wing zealots? Similar questions get asked every time a little white girl is kidnapped and murdered. As the news trucks gather and pundits spew, a few minority voices cry out asking why we don’t give equal coverage to the regular killing of children of color. And we have to ask it as we see the intense coverage of an attractive Iranian woman, gunned down by the religious secret police for the crime of being where people were demonstrating for democracy. "Empathy for the Common Man" also helped distinguish the different kinds of bigots, racists who commit crime against immigrants and foreigners. Not all are motivated by religious beliefs, and not all are political activists... However, they are all united by one common denominator: ignorant hate. The murders in Arizona were different from these political murders. The killers were not religious fanatics trying to impose their viewpoint. They were members of “respectable” militia groups. “Respectable” bigots. The accused leader of the kill squad is a woman whose hate writings remained posted on a “respectable” militia website after the murders until the AP started asking about it. Now that she’s been arrested, the “respectable” bigots are trying to run from their association with the killers. [...]Where did they learn to kill little girls in their own homes? Our own Pentagon has refused to punish soldiers who rape and kill Iraqi and Afghani little girls, as long as the rapes and murders are in “combat zones.” These militia killers pretend they are fighting a war against racially inferior Latinos in our country. “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel” said Dr. Johnson in 1775. And so it remains today. This is neocon courage. How many Latino families like the one gunned down in Arizona are working to improve themselves? Without press fanfare, they mow our lawns, tend our children, and clean our offices at night. And without press fanfare, they die from the violence of racist killers pretending to be “protecting the good people.” They suffer and die while “the liberal media” ignore them and wait for the next JonBenét. The facts remain: a hispanic family 10 miles from the U.S./MX border is slain in their home during a home invasion by a team of white racist bigots posing as US Marshals. In the same month, an elderly white supremacist male walks into the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. and mercilessly shoots and kills an African-American security guard. Each story is indeed horrendous. Interestingly, the Holocaust/D.C. event clearly receives more national media attention while the Immigrant/Arizona story (arguably more brutal) is slow to catch and barely circulated with the same furrosity. Thanks Tom Hall. Photos courtesy of Change.org Jun24911 Audio Clip of Murderous Home Invasion by MinutemenPosted By Tina Kosikowski at 10:58 AM | 1 Comments
This audio clip featured on CNN does all the talking, figuratively and literally... Often times we read or simply hear about atrocities committed against foreigners and immigrants. Rarely, however, are we afforded the opportunity to orientate ourselves directly to such human experience through hearing or seeing for ourselves. By clicking here you can listen to the 911 call made by a woman after she had witnessed her husband, Raul Flores, and daughter murdered during a home invasion by Arizona Minutemen. Please listen carefully and tune into the experience as though it were you making the call. Read the article excerpt "Rogue Minutemen leader held in fatal home invasion" by CNN's Patrick Oppmann below- Raul Flores thought federal agents had barged with guns drawn into his home in Arivaca, Arizona, in the middle of the night. Shawna Forde, 41, denies involvement in the shooting deaths of an Arizona man and his daughter. But there was no backup waiting outside, and no fugitive. The marshals were imposters. As the intruders searched his home, Flores asked one of the men why his handgun was taped. The man responded by shooting and killing Flores. "Someone just came in and shot my daughter and husband," Flores' wife frantically told 911. She tells the police operator that she was shot and left for dead with her husband, Raul Flores, 29, and daughter Brisenia, 9, who were both shot in the head. Police are not releasing the woman's name to protect her identity. But her 911 call, released to the media by the Pima County Sheriff's Department, tells the story of a deadly home invasion by a rogue band of impostors. As she describes the initial attack, the intruders return to the house. The door can be heard opening. "They are coming back in! They are coming back in!" the caller screams. She has armed herself with her husband's handgun. Brought to my attention by a fellow pro-migrant blogger, the article "Citizenship for sale?" posted by The Arizona Daily Star has provoked over 180 dynamically polarized comments regarding immigration, healthcare, and so-called "anchor babies." How do you feel about this? Read the excerpt below, link to the full article, and comment to this blog!
TMC offering maternity packages to Mexican women, raising questions on birthright 7. Comment by Jeffrey H. (flibber) The following recent CNN clip features Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Rep. Michael Honda (D-California) debating the need for legislation that would end lengthy separations of loved ones. Honda introduced the Reuniting Familes Act this month, arguing that this legislation "would give us a good head of steam" moving towards comprehensive reform. Chaffetz argues that the bill, which would make it easier for immigrants to obtain visas, is badly timed given the number of Americans currently struggling and out of work due to the recession. The bill also offers same-sex partners equal protection and access to visas for the purpose of reunification, an addition which both Congressmen debate in this clip. While I believe family reunification is a key aspect of reform, I would really like to see this bundled with other pieces of legislation, such as AgJobs and the DREAM Act, so that immigration reform is not addressed in a piecemeal way. Just this past Friday, President Obama reiterated the need for comprehensive reform as the keynote speaker at the Esperanza Prayer Breakfast. But the big question remain, when and how will it happen? As a single bulk piece of legislation, which has yet to surface, or as many smaller bills which are currently on the table but which do not address all the critical pieces of comprehensive reform? |



